Rodriguez v. Cain et al

Filing 104

OPINION Adopting 98 Report and Recommendations... the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs state law claims, The Court grants 31 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by Chad Oubre, James M. LeBlanc, N. Bu rl Cain, Dave Akenbrand, 18 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by N. Burl Cain, Dave Akenbrand, and 57 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by John Larry Calvert...dismissing this action with prejudice...Judgment shall be entered.. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 09/28/2011. (KDC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LUIS RODRIGUEZ (#381927) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 10-0736-FJP-DLD N. BURL CAIN, ET AL. O P I N I O N After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report to which an objection was filed: IT IS ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims, and that the defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment,1 shall be granted, dismissing the plaintiff’s claim asserted against defendant Burl Cain –that the defendant failed to train and/or supervise his employees – for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, and dismissing all of the plaintiff’s remaining claims asserted against the defendants, with prejudice, and that this action shall be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 28, 2011. S FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. Nos. 18, 31 and 57. Doc#47497

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?