Pitre v. Boutte et al

Filing 23

OPINION Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge...The defendants Motion for SummaryJudgment 10 shall be granted, dismissing the plaintiffs claimsasserted herein for failure to exhaust administrative remedies asmandated by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, and that this action shall be dismissed. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 08/22/2011. (KDC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ANTHONY C. PITRE (#475323) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 10-0768-FJP-CN ASSISTANT WARDEN FREDERICK BOUTTE, ET AL. O P I N I O N After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report to which an objection was filed: IT IS ORDERED the that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment1 shall be granted, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims asserted herein for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, and that this action shall be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, August 22, 2011. S FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. No. 10 Doc#47419

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?