Jackson v. Hartley

Filing 25

RULING: The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the 23 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Stephen C. Riedlinger dated June 3, 2011, and the objection filed by the dft. The court refers this matter back to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration... Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 8/5/2011. (CMM) Modified on 8/8/2011 to edit text. (CMM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
KENNEDY JACKSON (#297999)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 10-792-JJB-SCR
LT. HARTLEY
RULING
The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this
action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Stephen C.
Riedlinger dated June 3, 2011 (doc. no. 23), and the objection filed by the defendant. The
court refers this matter back to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, August 5, 2011.

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA