Wells v. Vannoy

Filing 45

RULING Adopting 43 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and Defts 21 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART, dismissing all of the plaintiffs claims except the plaintiffs claim that Vannoy improperly rejected the book Pimpology i n violation of his constitutional rights. Further, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claim. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for consideration of the amended complaint. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 7/13/2011. (JDL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
TYRONNE WELLS (#397072)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 10-821-JJB-SCR
CINDY VANNOY
RULING
The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action,
and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Riedlinger
dated June 20, 2011 (doc. no. 43) to which no objection has been filed.
The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and
adopts it as the court’s opinion herein. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED
IN PART, dismissing all of the plaintiff’s claims except the plaintiff’s claim that Vannoy improperly
rejected the book Pimpology in violation of his constitutional rights. Further, the court declines to
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claim. This matter is referred back to the
Magistrate Judge for consideration of the amended complaint.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 13th day of July, 2011.

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA