Wetzel v. Prince et al

Filing 16

RULING Adopting 15 Report and Recommendations, of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the plaintiff's 1 complaint is Dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to pay the Court's filing fee. Further, the plaintiff's pending motions are Denied as moot. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 4/18/2011. (CMM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ANDREW DAVID WETZEL (#539179) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-10-JJB-CN HOWARD PRINCE, ET AL. RULING The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christine Noland, dated March 21, 2011 (doc. no. 15) to which no objection has been filed. The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court’s opinion herein. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the Court’s filing fee. Further, the plaintiff’s pending motions are DENIED as moot. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April 18, 2011. JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?