Henderson v. Turner et al
Filing
174
ORDER AND REASONS granting 161 Motion in Limine regarding causation. Signed by Judge Helen Ginger Berrigan on 02/05/2013. (kac)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LATESHA HENDERSON, ET AL
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 11-39
MAJOR JOE TURNER, ET AL
SECTION: "C" (4)
ORDER AND REASONS
Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion in limine regarding causation. Rec. doc. 161.
Defendants oppose the motion. Rec. Doc. 166. Having reviewed the record, memoranda of
counsel, and the law, the motion is GRANTED for the following reasons.
In the Court’s previous order (Rec. Doc. 168, p. 1), it limited Dr. Tarver’s testimony to
that of a fact witness with “opinions rationally based on his perceptions” not “based on scientific,
technical, or other specialized knowledge . . . .” FRE 701. Dr. Tarver may testify regarding what
he observed on the day of Mr. Dawkins’ death, including his assessment of the cause of death.
Dr. Tarver is not to be asked, nor is he to give, any opinion regarding whether Dawkins
was compliant or not with his recommended treatments. The Court has previously ruled that
recovery for civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are not subject to diminution resulting
from comparative fault. Burge v. Parish of St. Tammany, 1995 WL 317125 at *3 (E.D. La.). Rec.
Doc. 111, p. 4.
The Court previously DENIED plaintiff’s motion in limine to find Dr. Tarver’s
Interoffice Memorandum, Medical Department inadmissible as hearsay. Rec. Doc. 168.
However, in reviewing this motion, the Court now finds that while the Interoffice Memorandum,
Medical Department, Rec. Doc. 161, Exh. A, “Defendant’s Expert Report,” should not be
excluded as hearsay, it is excluded as unduly prejudicial. FRE 403. The report references
Dawkins as “noncompliant” with recommended treatment. Rec. Doc. 161, Exh. A, p. 2.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Rec. Doc. 161.
New Orleans, Louisiana this 6th day of February, 2013.
______________________________
HELEN G. BERRIGAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?