Williams v. Angrum et al

Filing 19

OPINION Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge...The Court finds that the defendants' motion for summary judgment 18 is denied. The Court further finds that plaintiff's claims against Lt. Bradley, MSgt. Canon and Sgt. Davis aredismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This action is hereby referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 07/16/2012. (KDC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
CORDERRAL WILLIAMS
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 11-287-FJP-SCR
LT. V. ANGRUM, ET AL
O P I N I O N
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case
and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report1 to
which no objection was filed:
The Court finds that the defendants' motion for summary
judgment2 is denied.
claims

against

Lt.

The Court further finds that plaintiff's
Bradley,

MSgt.

Canon

and

Sgt.

Davis

are

dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 4(m) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.

This action is hereby referred back to

the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, July 16, 2012.

S
FRANK J. POLOZOLA

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

1

Rec. Doc. No. 18.

2

Rec. Doc. No. 16.

Doc#47935