Wilson v. Cain et al

Filing 56

SUPPLEMENTAL RULING regarding 52 Order on Motion to Compel. Insofar as the pltf sought to compel the production of Capt. Luke Rheams' Disciplinary Reports, the motion to compel is now denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 1/30/2013. (JDL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

MONDRELL WILSON (#378506)
VERSUS

CIVIL ACTION

N. BURL CAIN, ET AL

NUMBER 11-289-BAJ-SCR

SUPPLEMENTAL RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERABLE DOCUMENTS
On January 22, 2013, a ruling was issued granting in part and
denying in part the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discoverable
Documents.

Record document number 52.

granted in part.
defendants

were

Plaintiff’s motion was

As to the plaintiff’s document Request 2, the
ordered

to

Disciplinary Report issued to

submit

a

copy

of

each

employee

Capt. Luke Rheams under seal for in

camera inspection. In all other respects, the motion to compel was
denied.
Defendants promptly complied with the ruling and filed the
required documents under seal.1

A review of the documents filed

under seal showed that none of the materials are relevant to any
issue in this case and the production of these documents is not
reasonably

calculated

to

lead

to

the

discovery

of

relevant

evidence.
Accordingly, insofar as the plaintiff sought to compel the
production of Capt. Luke Rheams’ Disciplinary Reports, the motion

1

Record document number 53-2.

to compel is now denied.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, January 30, 2013.

STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2