Pat's Garage Doors & Repairs, LLC et al v. Distribution by Datagen, Inc. et al
Filing
49
ORDER re 26 Second MOTION for Protective Order. ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a supplemental memorandum, no later that 2/10/2012 as stated within document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 2/7/2012. (CLM, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
PAT’S GARAGE DOORS &
REPAIRS, LLC, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO: 11-0380
DISTRIBUTION BY DATAGEN,
INC., ET AL.
SECTION: “R” (4)
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendants’ Second Amended Motion for Protective Order as to
Rule 26 Initial Disclosures and Discovery (R. Doc. 26) filed by Defendants Distribution by
Datagen, Inc., Gallagher Health Studies, Inc., Inspired by Coconut, Inc., Smart Services, Inc.,
Michael Purr, Marlin Brett Dixon, John Micalizio, and Strategic Benefit Alliance, Inc.
(“Defendants”) seeking an order from this Court staying discovery, including Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure (“Rule”) 26 initial disclosures, until ten (10) days after the date of the presiding District
Court Judge’s ruling on Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
In their opposition to the motion (R. Doc. 32), Plaintiffs Pat’s Garage Doors & Repairs, LLC,
Pat S. Baker, Kirk E. Baker, John Baker, and Jennifer Vosburg (“Plaintiffs”) state that since the
parties October 13, 2011 preliminary conference, the parties have engaged in settlement
negotiations. Plaintiffs further state that they “do not oppose staying discovery and Rule 26 initial
disclosures until such time as settlement negotiations have concluded.” (R. Doc. 32, p. 2.)
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a supplemental memorandum detailing the status
of the parties’ settlement negotiations, including whether settlement negotiations are ongoing and
how long the parties predict settlement negotiations will continue, no later than Friday, February
10, 2012.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 7th day of February 2012.
KAREN WELLS ROBY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?