Scott et al v. Southern Towing Company et al

Filing 12

RULING: The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the courts opinion herein. Accordingly, the Motion to Remand and for Attorneys Fees and Costs 3 filed by plaintiffs, Anthony Scott and Stacy Sc ott, individually and on behalf of their minor children, is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana, for further proceedings. Further, the plaintiffs are entitled to an award of $4,000.00 for the attorneys fees that they incurred in connection with the defendants improper removal of this case.. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 1214/2011. (CMM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ANTHONY SCOTT, ET AL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-573-JJB-CN SOUTHERN TOWING CO., ET AL. RULING The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christine Noland dated November 22, 2011 (doc. no. 11) to which no objection has been filed. The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court’s opinion herein. Accordingly, the Motion to Remand and for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (doc. no. 3) filed by plaintiffs, Anthony Scott and Stacy Scott, individually and on behalf of their minor children, is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana, for further proceedings. Further, the plaintiffs are entitled to an award of $4,000.00 for the attorney’s fees that they incurred in connection with the defendant’s improper removal of this case. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, December 14, 2011. JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?