Smith v. Gagnard et al

Filing 54

RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The partial motion to dismiss filed by Gagnard and Washington is granted insofar as defts seek dismissal of plaintiffs claims that he was issued a false disciplinary report and that the defendants violat ed DOC regulations, and the motion is denied otherwise. Plaintiffs claim that he was issued a false disciplinary report and that the department violated Department of Corrections regulations are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to any state law claim.. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 4/30/2012. (PJH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA EARTON LYNN SMITH (#305982) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-614-BAJ-SCR GRADY GAGNARD, ET AL RULING The Court, having carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated March 14, 2012 (doc. 44), to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the Court’s opinion herein. Accordingly, the partial motion to dismiss filed by defendants, Grady Gagnard and Kenneth Washington, is granted insofar as defendants seek dismissal of plaintiff’s claims that he was issued a false disciplinary report and that the defendants violated Department of Corrections regulations, and the motion is denied otherwise. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs claim that he was issued a false disciplinary report and that the department violated Department of Corrections regulations are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to any state law claim. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April 30, 2012. BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?