Dyson v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
Filing
18
RULING Adopting 16 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 11 Motion to Remand filed by Edward Dyson is GRANTED insofar as the plaintiff seeks a remand of the case to state court. Insofar as the plaintiff seeks an award of attorney's fees and expenses, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 12/14/2011. (LSM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
EDWARD DYSON
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 11-672-JJB-SCR
ADVANCED BIONICS, L.L.C., ET AL
RULING
The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this
action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen
C. Riedlinger dated November 21, 2011 (doc. no. 16) to which no objection has been filed.
The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge
and adopts it as the court’s opinion herein. Accordingly, the Motion to Remand filed by
plaintiff Edward Dyson is GRANTED insofar as the plaintiff seeks a remand of the case to
the state court. Insofar as the plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees and expenses, the
motion is DENIED..
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, December 14, 2011.
JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?