North v. Jones et al

Filing 10

RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and that this action is hereby dismissed, without prejudice to the plaintiffs right to seek habeas corpus relief or other relief upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphry.. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 7/25/2012. (PJH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
RUSSELL NORTH (1866)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 11-865-BAJ-DLD
SUSAN K. JONES, ET AL
RULING
and ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The Court has carefully considered the motion, the record, the law applicable
to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge Docia L. Dalby dated July 11, 2012 (doc. 8), and plaintiff’s objection filed June
20, 2012 (doc. 9).
The Court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate
judge and adopts it as the Court’s opinion herein.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed as legally frivolous and for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted within the meaning of 28
U.S.C. § 1915, and that this action is hereby dismissed, without prejudice to the
plaintiff’s right to seek habeas corpus relief or other relief upon satisfaction of the
conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphry.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, July 25, 2012.

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA