Vincent v. Noland et al

Filing 5

OPINION Adopting 4 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Court finds that this action should be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure of the plaintiff to pay the court's filing fee. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 3/7/2012. (LSM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA HAROLD VINCENT (#73128) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 12-5-FJP-DLD CHRISTINE NOLAND, ET AL O P I N I O N After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report1 to which no objection was filed: The Court finds that this action should be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure of the plaintiff to pay the Court's filing fee. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March 7, 2012. S FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. No. 4. Doc#47741

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?