Davis v. Coastal Bridge Company et al

Filing 6

JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the defendant Coastal Bridge Company, et al and against plaintiff Charlotte R. Davis. Plaintiff's complaint is sua sponte dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) as frivolous, and plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is therefore dismissed as moot. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 8/14/12. (DCB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

CHARLOTTE R. DAVIS
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 12-309-FJP-DLD
COASTAL BRIDGE COMPANY, ET AL

JUDGMENT
For the written reasons assigned:
Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant Coastal Bridge
Company,

et

al

and

against

plaintiff

Charlotte

R.

Davis.

Plaintiff's complaint is sua sponte dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e) as frivolous, and plaintiff's application to proceed in
forma pauperis1 is therefore dismissed as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, August 14, 2012.

S
FRANK J. POLOZOLA

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

1

Rec. Doc. No. 2.

Doc#47962