Ford v. Rogers

Filing 10

RULING AND ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations; denying 5 Motion to Consolidate Cases ; dismissing Plaintiff's complaint and amended complaint ; dismissing as moot 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 9 Motion for Judge Review. The new complaint shall be filed into the docket as a separate action. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 9/20/12. (DCB) Modified on 9/21/2012 to edit text (DCB).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
BRENDIA FORD
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 12-325-BAJ-DLD
CARL ROGERS
RULING AND ORDER
The Court has carefully considered the motion, the record, the law
applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Docia L. Dalby dated July 19, 2012 (doc. 7), and plaintiffs’
objection filed August 3, 2012 (doc. 8).
The Court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the
magistrate judge and adopts it as the Court’s opinion herein.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to consolidate complaints
(doc. 5) is denied, and the new “complaint” shall be filed into the docket as a
separate action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Ford's complaint and amended
complaint is sua sponte dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous, and
Ford's application to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is dismissed as moot.
The Court observes that Ms. Ford has additionally filed a motion for judge
review (doc. 9). In this motion, Ms. Ford asserts the same frivolous and
nonsensical arguments that she made in her objection.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for judge review (doc. 9) is
denied.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 20, 2012.

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA