Bannister v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
8
ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR SERVICE: The Order to Show Cause issued 06/11/2013 is vacated.The time for the plaintiff to serve the defendant with a summons and the complaint as required by Rule 4 (i)(1) and (2) is extended until 07/31/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 06/28/2013. (CGP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ARMINEA BANNISTER
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NUMBER 12-744-BAJ-SCR
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND
SETTING DEADLINE FOR SERVICE
Plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing on June 21,
2013 why her complaint should not be dismissed for failure to
properly serve the defendant within the time allowed by Rule 4(m),
Fed.R.Civ.P.1
The response to the show cause order indicates two reasons for
the lack of service.2
Counsel for the plaintiff explained that
after the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was granted, counsel
proceeded in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and prepared Form 285
for each person to be served, and on December 17, 2012 forwarded
the forms by mail to the U.S. Marshal’s Office.3
After mailing the
forms counsel believed that no further action was required to
effect service.
unable
to
work
Shortly thereafter, counsel became ill and was
for
several
months.
For
1
Record document number 6.
2
Record document number 7.
3
Record document number 7-1, Exhibit A.
these
reasons,
the
plaintiff urged the court to find good cause for the failure to
timely serve the defendant, or in the alternative, asked for a
discretionary extension of time to effect service.
With regard to mailing the Form 285 to the U.S. Marshal to
effect service, it is apparent that counsel failed to take note
that
the
order
granting
leave
to
proceed
in
forma
pauperis
specifically stated in bold type that the plaintiff is responsible
for serving the defendant in the manner required by Rule 4,
Fed.R.Civ.P.4
In Social Security cases where in forma pauperis
status is granted and the plaintiff is represented by counsel, this
procedure is followed because service can be accomplished simply by
mailing the summons and complaint to the appropriate government
officials and delivering a copy to the United States Attorney for
the district, as provided under Rule 4(i).5
A Form 285 is not
needed.
Nevertheless, this misunderstanding combined with counsel’s
illness constitute good cause for the plaintiff’s failure to timely
serve the defendant, and for extending the time for the plaintiff
to effect service under Rule 4(m).6
4
Record document number 3.
5
The time and cost for the plaintiff is minimal and this
procedure helps relieve the administrative burdens on the U.S.
Marshal’s Office.
6
See, Thompson v. Brown, 91 F.3d 20, 21 (5th Cir. 1996);
Newby v. Enron Corp., 284 Fed.Appx. 146 (5th Cir. 2008).
2
Therefore;
IT IS ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause issued June 11,
2013 is vacated.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for the plaintiff to serve
the defendant with a summons and the complaint as required by Rule
4(i)(1) and (2) is extended until July 31, 2013.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, June 28, 2013.
STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?