Willis v. EAN Holdings,LLC et al

Filing 25

ORDER: as to 1 Notice of Removal, filed by EAN Holdings,LLC Defendant EAN Holdings, LLC shall submit a brief, not later than 21 days after the date of this order, in support of their contention that this court has jurisdiction, specificall y addressing the alleged fraudulent joinder of defendant Thibodaux. Plaintiff shall then have 21 days from the submission of the defendants brief to file a response brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 6/10/2013. (LLH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MARSHA A. WILLIS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 12-760-BAJ-RLB EAN HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL. ORDER This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On November 30, 2012, the defendant EAN Holdings, LLC filed a Notice of Removal, asserting diversity jurisdiction based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Specifically, defendant EAN Holdings, LLC alleges that the non-diverse defendant Troy David Thibodaux was fraudulently joined as a defendant and his citizenship should be disregarded for the purposes of determining diversity jurisdiction. The removing party bears the burden of demonstrating fraudulent joinder. Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). Whether this court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this action is a threshold matter that cannot be resolved on the face of the pleadings filed to date. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendant EAN Holdings, LLC shall submit a brief, not later than 21 days after the date of this order, in support of their contention that this court has jurisdiction, specifically addressing the alleged fraudulent joinder of defendant Thibodaux. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall then have 21 days from the submission of the defendants’ brief to file a response brief. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on June 10, 2013. S RICHARD L. BOURGEOIS, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?