Wetzel v. Prince et al

Filing 9

RULING AND ORDER: The 8 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein. This matter be DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the Court's filing fee. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 11/4/2013. (NLT)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ANDREW DAVID WETZEL (#539179) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS HOWARD PRINCE, ET AL. NO.: 13-00228-BAJ-RLB RULING AND ORDER On May 16, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that Plaintiff Andrew Wetzel’s complaint be dismissed for failure to pay the Court’s filing fee (Doc. 8). Plaintiff was ordered to pay the full amount of the Court’s filing fee within 21 days of the denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the report and recommendation. Having carefully considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report, the record, and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report is correct, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED as the Court’s opinion herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned matter be DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the Court’s filing fee. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 4th day of November, 2013. ______________________________________ BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?