Wetzel v. Prince et al
Filing
9
RULING AND ORDER: The 8 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein. This matter be DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the Court's filing fee. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 11/4/2013. (NLT)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL (#539179)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
HOWARD PRINCE, ET AL.
NO.: 13-00228-BAJ-RLB
RULING AND ORDER
On May 16, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report and
recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that Plaintiff
Andrew Wetzel’s complaint be dismissed for failure to pay the Court’s filing fee (Doc.
8). Plaintiff was ordered to pay the full amount of the Court’s filing fee within 21 days
of the denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has not filed
an objection to the report and recommendation.
Having carefully considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report, the record, and the
applicable law, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report is correct, and
hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Doc. 8) is
ADOPTED as the Court’s opinion herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned matter be
DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the Court’s filing fee.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 4th day of November, 2013.
______________________________________
BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?