Harrold v Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., et al

Filing 16

RULING affirming and adopting the 9 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Plaintiff's Randall Harrold's 5 Motion to Remand is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c)(2), the Jones Act claims asserted against Weeks Marine, Inc. and Aerotek, Inc., are SEVERED and REMANDED to the 19th Judicial District Court of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Certified copy of this order sent to 19th JDC. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 2/19/2014. (LLH) (Main Document 16 replaced on 2/20/2014) (LLH).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RANDALL HARROLD CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 13-762-JJB-SCR LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., ET AL. RULING AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS This matter is before the court on the Plaintiff Randall Harrold’s Motion (doc. 5) to Remand. In his Report and Recommendations (doc. 9), the Magistrate Judge found that the Motion to Remand should be denied, based primarily on the 2011 revisions to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed an Objection (doc. 10) to the Report and Recommendations, to which the defendant filed a memorandum (doc. 13) in support. After reviewing the Report and Recommendations and the parties’ respective briefings on the matter, the Plaintiff Randall Harrold’s Motion (doc. 5) to Remand is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court hereby AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations (doc. 9). However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c)(2), the Jones Act claims asserted against Weeks Marine, Inc. and Aerotek, Inc., are SEVERED and REMANDED to the 19th Judicial District Court of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on February 19, 2014.   JUDGE JAMES J. BRADY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 19th JDC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?