Veals et al v. Chrysler Group LLC et al

Filing 22

ORDER: Plaintiff's shall submit a brief or other appropriate filing no later than 6/5/2015, addressing whether the amount in controversy requirement required by the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is satisfied or jurisdiction is otherwise appropri ate. The brief shall address the Fifth Circuit's decision Scarlott v. Nissan North America, Inc., 771 F.3d 883 (5th Cir. 2014). Any defendants may file a reply to any brief or other filing, if desired, within 21 days of such filing without seeking leave of court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 5/20/2015. (LLH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RACQUEL SINCLAIR VEALS, ET AL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO.: 14-670-SDD-RLB CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC, ET AL ORDER This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On October 23, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a Complaint against the defendants alleging a claim pursuant to the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. (“MMWA”). The MMWA “allows litigants to bring breach-of-warranty claims in federal court if the amount in controversy is at least $50,000.” Scarlott v. Nissan North America, Inc., 771 F.3d 883, 886 (5th Cir. 2014) (citing 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(3)(B)). In the Status Report filed by the parties on March 27, 2015 (R. Doc. 17), one defendant questioned whether the minimal amount in controversy to support federal jurisdiction pursuant to the MMWA is satisfied. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall submit a brief or other appropriate filing no later than June 5, 2015, addressing whether the amount in controversy requirement required by the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is satisfied or jurisdiction is otherwise appropriate. The brief shall address the Fifth Circuit’s decision Scarlott v. Nissan North America, Inc., 771 F.3d 883 (5th Cir. 2014). Any defendants may file a reply to any brief or other filing, if desired, within 21 days of such filing without seeking leave of court. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on May 20, 2015. S RICHARD L. BOURGEOIS, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?