Williams et al v. Innis Community Health Center, Inc. et al
Filing
31
RULING: The defendant's 29 Motion to Compel Discovery is granted. Within 14 days plaintiff Peter Williams shall serve his answers to the defendant's interrogatories, produce all documents responsive to the defendant's request for pr oduction of documents, and complete, sign and return to counsel for the defendant the verification (or a declaration under oath), all without objections. Failure to comply with ruling may subject the plaintiff to sanctions, including dismissal of the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 12/14/2015. (BCL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
PETER WILLIAMS AND
ALFREDA WILLIAMS
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NUMBER 15-210-SDD-SCR
INNIS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER,
INC., ET AL.
RULING MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
Before the court is the Motion to Compel Discovery filed by
defendant United States of America. Record document number 29. No
opposition has been filed.
For the reasons stated by the defendant in its supporting
memorandum, under Rule 37(a)(3) and (d)(1)(A), Fed.R.Civ.P., the
defendant is entitled to the relief requested.
required
to
answer
the
interrogatories,
Plaintiff will be
produce
responsive
documents, and return the verification signed before a notary (or
alternatively provide a declaration under oath), within 14 days.
No objections will be allowed.1
Accordingly, the defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery is
granted.
Within 14 days plaintiff Peter Williams shall serve his
answers to the defendant’s interrogatories, produce all documents
responsive to the defendant’s request for production of documents,
1
Generally, discovery objections are waived if a party fails
to timely object to interrogatories, production requests or other
discovery efforts. See, In re U.S., 864 F.2d 1153, 1156 (5th Cir.),
reh’g denied, 869 F.2d 1487 (5th Cir. 1989); Godsey v. U.S., 133
F.R.D. 111, 113 (S.D. Miss. 1990.)
and complete, sign and return to counsel for the defendant the
verification (or a declaration under oath), all without objections.
Failure
to
comply
with
ruling
may
subject
the
plaintiff
sanctions, including dismissal of the Complaint.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, December 14, 2015.
STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
to
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?