Lewis et al v. Cain et al

Filing 347

RULING : The 246 Motion in Limine is DENIED with full reservation of rights to urge objections at the time of trial. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 10/24/2017. (LLH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
JOSEPH LEWIS, JR., ET AL.

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

15-318-SDD- RLB

BURL CAIN, ET AL.
RULING
Before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine.1 The motion is opposed.2 The
Plaintiffs filed a Reply.3 Plaintiffs move to exclude the following:
1. Non-Expert witness testimony based on medical records;
2. Witness testimony that contradicts Rule 30(b)(6) testimony;
3. Expert witness testimony exceeding the scope of the expert’s report;
4. Documents not disclosed produced in discovery;
5. Electronically stored information (“ESI”) not produced in discovery; and
6. Defendants assertions that ADA Complaints and Requests for Accommodation
is Exhaustive.
The Court has duly considered the evidentiary objections and Defendants’
response. Plaintiffs’ objections are reserved and ruling is deferred to the time of trial.
Accordingly the Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine4 is DENIED with full reservation of rights
to urge objections at the time of trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana on October 24, 2017.

S

JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

1

Rec. Doc. 246.
Rec. Doc. 273.
3
Rec. Doc. 287.
4
Rec. Doc. 246.
2

Document Number: 42422