Lejeune et al v. Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Inc. et al
Filing
15
RULING Adopting 14 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge: The 10 Motion to Remand is DENIED. The Court also concludes that Plaintiffs are not entitled to costs, expenses, or attorney's fees. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 8/27/2015. (BCL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
EUGENE A. LEJEUNE, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
CONESTOGA-ROVERS &
ASSOCIATES, INC.
NO.: 15-00396-BAJ-SCR
RULING AND ORDER
Before the Court is a Motion to Remand (Doc. 10), filed by Pla intiffs
E ugen e A. Lejue ne a nd Tar a Lejuene, seeking a n order from t his Court remanding
the above-captioned matter to the Eightee nt h Judicial District Court, P arish of
Iberville, State of Louisia na . Specifically, Plaintiffs a rgue th at complete diver sity of
citizenship does not exist to sustain thi Cour t's subject matter jurisdiction. a n d
th ey furt her contend that not a ll Defendants con sented to remova l. (Doc. 10-2 at pp.
3-5). In their mot ion, Plaintiffs also seek costs, expenses, and attorney's fees. (Doc.
10 at p. 3). Defenda nts Action Resources, Inc. and Conestoga-Rovers & Associa tes,
I nc. oppose P la int iffs' motion . (Docs. 12, 13).
The Magistrate J udge issued a Report a n d Recommendation , recommendin g
th at Plaint iffs' Motion to Re mand be denied, finding tha t complete diver sity of
citizen ship exists a nd rejecting Pla int iffs' argumen t regarding a lack of con sen t.
(See Doc. 14 at pp. 3-5). No objections were filed to t he lVIagistrate J udge's Report.
1
Having carefully considered Plaintiffs' motion, Defendants' oppositions, a nd
the Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court APPROVES t he Magistrate Judge's
Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14), and ADOPTS the Report as the
Court's opinion herein.
For r easons explained in the Magistrate Judge's Report,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Euge ne A. Lejuene a nd Tara Lejuene's
Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) is DENIED. The Court also concludes that
Plaintiffs are not entitled to costs, expenses, or attorney's fees.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, t his
2
li
21- day of Augu st, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?