Scott v. Colvin

Filing 28

Opinion Adopting 27 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 03/13/2017. (EDC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DWAYNE ANTHONY SCOTT CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 15-404-JWD-EWD CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated February 27, 2017, to which no objection was filed: IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1 Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 13, 2017. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 See, Hawkes v. Colvin, 2014 WL 129341, at *1, *6 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 14, 2014) (“[P]ursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Acting Commissioner’s final decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Acting Commissioner for further consideration in accordance with the Court’s opinion.”); Volk v. Astrue, 2012 WL 4466480, at *6 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 27, 2012) (same); Hill v. Astrue, 2011 WL 679940, at *1, *11 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2011) (“The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) because the ALJ failed to properly evaluate Claimant’s RSD in compliance with SSR 03-2p and, therefore, the decision is not supported by substantial evidence.”); Bernstein v. Astrue, 2010 WL 746491, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 3, 2010) (reversing the Commissioner’s decision and remanding the matter to the ALJ pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and § 1383(c)(3) to evaluate plaintiff’s RSD in accordance with SSR 03-2p).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?