Cockerham v. Vannoy et al

Filing 10

AMENDED OPINION: Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 USC 1997e(a), but, with prejudice to re-filing the same claim or claims in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 2/24/2016. (JDL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

RAYMOND J. COCKERHAM, JR. (#364734)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NUMBER 15-630-JWD-EWD
WARDEN DARREL VANNOY, ET AL.
AMENDED OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case including Plaintiff’s objection
(Doc. 8), and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report issued November 13, 2015 to
which an objection was filed and considered:
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure
to exhaust available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (a), but with prejudice
to re-filing the same claim or claims in forma pauperis.1
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on February 24, 2016.

S

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

1 Underwood v. Wilson, 151 F.3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 1998).