Hebert v. City of Baton Rouge et al

Filing 378

OPINION Adopting 373 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 338 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and claims against Dr. Bridges are dismissed, with prejudice. FURTHER, the Court declines to exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs state law claims against this defendant, and this matter is referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/06/2018. (NLT)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MICHAEL HEBERT (#263630) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 15-850-JWD-RLB CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated November 1, 2018 (Doc. 373), the Court adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Court notes that it has reviewed both the objection filed by Plaintiff, (Doc. 376) and the report and recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. 373), and finds no error of fact or law. Indeed, the Court agrees with the assessment of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 338) is granted, and the plaintiff’s claims against defendant Dr. Bridges are dismissed, with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims against this defendant, and this matter is referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on December 6, 2018. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?