Hebert v. City of Baton Rouge et al
Filing
378
OPINION Adopting 373 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 338 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and claims against Dr. Bridges are dismissed, with prejudice. FURTHER, the Court declines to exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs state law claims against this defendant, and this matter is referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/06/2018. (NLT)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MICHAEL HEBERT (#263630)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 15-850-JWD-RLB
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL.
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in
the Magistrate Judge's Report dated November 1, 2018 (Doc. 373), the Court adopts the report and
recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Court notes that it has reviewed both the objection
filed by Plaintiff, (Doc. 376) and the report and recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge,
(Doc. 373), and finds no error of fact or law. Indeed, the Court agrees with the assessment of the
Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 338) is granted, and
the plaintiff’s claims against defendant Dr. Bridges are dismissed, with prejudice.
IT
IS
FURTHER
ORDERED
that
the
Court
declines
to
exercise
of
supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims against this defendant, and this
matter is referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings as appropriate.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on December 6, 2018.
S
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?