Thibodeaux et al vs GEICO Advantage Insurance Company et al

Filing 57

RULING AND ORDER denying 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 11/7/2018. (DCB)

Motion for Summary Judgment

Id.

Id.

See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.,

See, e.g. Augello v. Call

Buswell v. Mo. Pac.

Transp. Co.
See

Little v. Liquid Air Corp.

Matsushita Elec.
Indus. Co.

International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc.

Moore v. Progressive Sec. Ins. Co.
Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.

Domingo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Mart v. Hill

Moore
Lailhengue v. United States
Phipps v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Domingo

Hickman v. S. Pac. Transp. Co.

Snodgrass v.

Centanni

Dane v.
Canal Ins. Co.
Johnson
Iglinsky v. Player

Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v.

Manno v. Gutierrez:

Manno

Id.

Id.

Cartwright v. Firemen’s Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J.
aff’d

see also Delahoussaye v. State Farm Mut.

Auto. Ins. Co.

Arceneaux v. Domingue

Arceneaux

Sentry Ins. Co. v. Thomas

Arceneaux

Cartwright

(1) Whether Hiner followed the Thibodeaux vehicle too closely immediately before the
accident.

See

(2) Whether Hiner drove too quickly through the intersection at the time of the collision.

See

Id.

id. see also

Id.

(3) Whether Hiner had adequate time to press his emergency brake and thereby avoid the
accident.

(4) Whether and when brake fluid escaped from the brake line of Hiner’s vehicle.

see also

see also
before

after

(5) Whether Hiner was aware of potential brake issues before the accident.

Motion for Summary Judgment

S