Studley v. Head et al
ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1653, on or before 9/28/2016, the removing defendants shall file an amended notice of removal providing the citizenship of defendants Aon Risk Services, Inc., Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., and Ace American Insura nce Company, and intervenor Beckman Coulter, Inc. by setting forth all citizenship particulars required to sustain federal diversity jurisdiction and as an attachment to amended pleading, the removing defendants must file copies of state court records filed prior to removal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 9/15/2016. (LLH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
KIMBERLY HEAD, ET AL.
Before the court is the Notice of Removal (R. Doc. 1) filed on June 10, 2016, and the
Amended Notice of Removal (R. Doc. 4) filed on June 21, 2016. The court sua sponte notes the
potential insufficiency of the removing defendants’ allegation of the citizenship of defendants
Aon Risk Services, Inc. (“Aon”), Ace American Insurance (“Ace”),1 Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
(“Liberty”), and intervenor Beckman Coulter, Inc. (“Beckman”).
The removing defendants identify Aon, Ace, and Liberty as “foreign companies” as pled
in Plaintiff’s original Petition. (R. Doc. 1 at 2; R. Doc. 4 at 2). In a motion to remand filed on
July 9, 2016, Plaintiff asserts that Liberty is deemed a citizen of Louisiana pursuant to the direct
action provision, 28 U.S.C. §1332(c)(1). (R. Doc. 6). In their opposition, the removing
defendants assert that Liberty’s principal place of business is Massachusetts, but fail to identify
Liberty’s state of incorporation. (R. Doc. 8 at 2).
The removing defendants allege that Beckman is domiciled in Delaware and has a
principal place of business in California. (R. Doc. 1 at 3). They do not, however, identify
Beckman’s state of incorporation.
In support of remand, Plaintiff asserts that while the action was pending in state court, he “filed a Voluntary
Motion for Partial Dismissal regarding Defendant, Ace American Insurance Company, and dismissed his claim
without prejudice.” (R. Doc. 6-1 at 2). The removing defendants did not file any evidence into the record indicating
that Ace was dismissed as a defendant.
Based on the foregoing, the removing defendants have not sufficiently alleged the
citizenship of the corporate parties Aon, Ace, Liberty, and Beckman. The citizenship of a
corporation is determined by its state of incorporation and principal place of business. See 28
U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1); Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co. v. Pargas, Inc., 706 F.2d 633, 637 (5th
Cir. 1983). A corporation’s principal place of business is its “nerve center,” meaning “the place
where a corporation's officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation’s activities.” Hertz
Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 92 (2010).
In addition, the court has reviewed the record and find that the removing defendants
failed to file with their removal papers “a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders” served upon
the removing defendants prior to removal in this action as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a).
Accordingly, the Court will require the removing defendants to file with the Clerk “copies of all
records and proceedings” in the state court record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(b). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1653, that on or before September 28, 2016,
the removing defendants shall file an amended notice of removal providing the citizenship of
defendants Aon Risk Services, Inc., Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., and Ace American
Insurance Company, and intervenor Beckman Coulter, Inc. by setting forth all citizenship
particulars required to sustain federal diversity jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(b), that as an attachment of
the foregoing amended notice of removal the removing defendants must file copies of all records
and proceedings in the state court filed prior to the removal of this action.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 15, 2016.
RICHARD L. BOURGEOIS, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?