LaVergne v. Vaughn et al

Filing 112

OPINION Adopting 108 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 78 Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants Michael Vaughn and Bruce Dodd is granted, dismissing the plaintiffs' claims asserted against them, with prejudice . The plaintiff's 102 Counter Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, and the pending 75 and 76 Motions in Limine and 104 Motion for Summons are denied as moot, and this action shall be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/3/2019. (SWE)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BRANDON S. LAVERGNE (#424227), ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 16-400-JWD-RLB MICHAEL VAUGHN, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated March 21, 2019, to which an opposition was filed (Doc. 111); IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants Michael Vaughn and Bruce Dodd (R. Doc. 78), is granted, dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims asserted against them, with prejudice. IT IS FURHTER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s “Counter Motion for Summary Judgment” (R. Doc. 102) is denied, and the pending Motions in Limine (R. Docs. 75, 76) and Motion for Summons (R. Doc. 104) are denied as moot, and that this action shall be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 3, 2019.     S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?