Rosette v. Pinnacle Entertainment
Filing
57
RULING AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is GRANTED, and the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 6/18/2018. (KAH)
<![CDATA[
by Title VII. (Doc. 38-16 at p. 1). Plaintiff's generalized allegation that there was a
pattern and history of supervisors asking employees to lie and cover up incidents that
occurred do not raise a general issue of material fact that her firing was a mere
pretext. (Doc. 40-1 at p. 30). Therefore, Plaintiff has not met her burden of proof
regarding pretext and her retaliation claim is dismissed.
IV.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is
GRANTED, and the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this l<f-tay of June, 2018.
O , CHIEF JUDGE
BRIAN A. JA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
16
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
