Parker v. McJimpsey et al

Filing 5

RULING: Plaintiff's action shall be dismissed, without prejudice, because of his failure to pay the initial partial filing fee or comply with the Court's Orders. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 7/31/2017. (LLH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MARLOWE E. PARKER, JR. (#429838) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS WARDEN JODY McJIMPSEY, ET AL. NO. 17-0032-BAJ-EWD RULING On March 31, 2017, the Court entered an Order (R. Doc. 3) granting plaintiff=s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in this case and directing plaintiff to pay to the Clerk of Court, within twenty-one (21) days, an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $ 0.07, Aor this action shall be dismissed.@ The Court=s Order specifically advised plaintiff that it was his responsibility to pay the initial partial filing fee and that the prison would NOT forward payment of the initial partial filing fee without plaintiff=s written authorization. Id. Upon plaintiff=s failure to comply with the Court=s directive, the Court entered a second Order on June 6, 2017 (R. Doc. 4), directing Plaintiff to appear and show cause, in writing, within twenty-one (21) days, why his Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to pay the initial partial fee. The Court=s Order further directed Plaintiff to attach to his response copies of his inmate account transaction statements showing all activity in his inmate accounts “for the months of April, 2016 [sic] through the date of Plaintiff’s response, including deposits into, withdrawals from and balances in these accounts.” Id. Finally, the Court=s Order advised Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the Order Ashall@ result in the dismissal of Plaintiff=s action without further notice. Id. Despite notice and an opportunity to appear, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court=s Orders and has failed to provide any explanation for his failure to either pay the Court=s initial partial filing fee or provide the documentation requested by the Court reflecting the activity in his inmate accounts during the months following April, 2017. Accordingly, Plaintiff=s action shall be dismissed, without prejudice, because of his failure to pay the initial partial filing fee or comply with the Court=s Orders. IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned proceeding be DISMISSED, without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 31st day of July, 2017. BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?