Brooks v. Ranatza et al
Filing
10
OPINION adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The above-captioned proceeding is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure of Petitioner to pay the Court's filing fee as ordered. Judgments shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 1/26/2018. (SGO)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DONALD BROOKS (#85868)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 17-0117-JWD-EWD
SHERYL RANATZA, CHAIRPERSON, ET AL.
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set
forth in Magistrate Judge's Report dated January 11, 2018, to which no objection was filed:
IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned proceeding is dismissed, without
prejudice, for failure of Petitioner to pay the Court’s filing fee as ordered.1 Judgments shall
be entered accordingly.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on January 26, 2018.
S
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
1 Petitioner is advised that during the 14-day period allowed to him to object to this Report and Recommendation,
he may either pay the Court’s filing fee in the amount of $5.00 or, in lieu thereof, may seek to show the Court that he
has been unable to pay the fee during the entirety of the period since the Court’s initial Order assessing same in
October 2017. Petitioner may make this showing by attaching to his response copies of his inmate account transaction
statements showing the daily account activity in his inmate drawing, savings and reserve accounts for the months of
October 2017 through the date of Petitioner’s response, including deposits into, withdrawals from, and balances in
these accounts. Petitioner is advised that Canteen Log statements that do not contain the relevant information will not
be considered sufficient to make the required showing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?