Bunley v. LeBlanc et al

Filing 11

Ruling and Order: Adopting 10 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 6/9/2020. (ELW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ROBIN BUNLEY CIVIL ACTION VERSUS JAMES LEBLANC, ET AL. NO.: 17-00228-BAJ-EWD RULING AND ORDER Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Report and Recommendation addresses pro se Plaintiff Robin Bunley’s Complaint (Doc. 1) filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983, alleging that the legal programs department at the Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women is insufficient. The Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff’s action be dismissed with prejudice as legally frivolous and for the failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days from the date they received the Report and Recommendation to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. No objections or responses were filed by either party. 1 Having carefully considered the underlying Complaint and related filings, the Court approves the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) is ADOPTED as the Court’s opinion herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 9th day of June, 2020 _____________________________________ JUDGE BRIAN A. JACKSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?