Braud v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 39

NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Plaintiffs' opposition (Doc. 37) to Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 35) is hereby STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. Plaintiffs are hereby given seven (7) days from the date of this order to re-submit their opposition in proper form and with the evidence they rely upon. Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days thereafter to file a reply. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 3/28/2019. (KAH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DARLENE BRAUD CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-320-JWD-EWD WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL. NOTICE TO COUNSEL Plaintiffs’ opposition (Doc. 37) to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 35) is hereby STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. Plaintiffs have failed to attach summary judgment evidence in opposition of Defendant’s motion and/or have failed to provide citations to specific pages of the record to support their position. Both of these deficiencies make Plaintiff’s opposition fatally flawed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(1)(A), (3); Ragas v. Tenn. Gas Pipeline Co., 136 F.3d 455, 458 (5th Cir. 1998). Plaintiffs are hereby given seven (7) days from the date of this order to re-submit their opposition in proper form and with the evidence they rely upon. Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days thereafter to file a reply. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 28, 2019.         S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?