Jules v. Vannoy et al

Filing 17

OPINION: The Court declines to exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims, and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915(e) and 1915A. Denying as moot 15 Motion Requesting Service of Summons. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 9/19/2019. (EDC) Modified on 9/19/2019 to edit text. (EDC).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
EMANUEL JULES (#299983)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO.17-503-JWD-EWD
DARRYL VANNOY, ET AL.
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set
forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated July 23, 2019, to which no objection was filed;
IT IS ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over
any potential state law claims, and that this action is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, as
legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A.1
IT IS FURTHR ORDERED that Plaintiff’s pending Motion Requesting Service of
Summons (doc. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT.
Judgment shall be entered accordingly.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 19, 2019.

S
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

1 Plaintiff is advised that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that, “In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or
appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section[Proceedings in forma pauperis] if the prisoner
has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in
a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical
injury.”