Ancar v. LeBlanc et al

Filing 83

OPINION Adopting 81 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.The 67 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, in part, dismissing plaintiff's claims with prejudice except the plaintiff's claim asserted against defendants Boe ker and Vittorio regarding standing water in the shower. The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in connection with the plaintiff's potential state law claims. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. for further proceedings. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/22/2019. (SGO)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ALLEN ANCAR (#299054)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO: 17-913-JWD-RLB
JAMES LEBLANC, ET AL.
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set
forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated April 2, 2019, (Doc. 81), to which an opposition
was filed (Doc. 82);
IT IS ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 67) is
granted, in part, dismissing plaintiff’s claims with prejudice except the plaintiff’s claim
asserted against defendants Boeker and Vittorio regarding standing water in the shower.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental
jurisdiction in connection with the plaintiff’s potential state law claims.

This matter is

referred back to Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. for further proceedings.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 22, 2019.

S
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA