Jones v. DISA Global Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 99

OPINION Adopting the 94 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 98 Joint Objection filed by all defendants is OVERRULED, and Plaintiff's 42 MOTION for Leave to File Third Supplemental and Amending Petition for Damage s is GRANTED, and shall be filed into the record. Entry of the third supplemental and amending complaint for damages into the record, which destroys diversity jurisdiction in this action, the Court REMANDS this action to the 19th Judicial District Court, East BatonRouge Parish, Louisiana.Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 6/27/2018. (LLH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ANDREW JONES CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-1058-JWD-RLB DISA GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge's Report dated June 11, 2018, to which a joint objection , (Doc. 98) was filed and considered by the Court, the Court agreeing the with the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; IT IS ORDERED that the joint objection filed by all defendants, (Doc. 98) is OVERRULED, and plaintiff’s motion for leave of court to file a third supplemental and amending petition for damages (R. Doc. 42) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s third supplemental and amending complaint for damages (R. Doc. 42-1) shall be filed into the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that subsequent to the entry of the third supplemental and amending complaint for damages into the record, which destroys diversity jurisdiction in this action, the Court REMANDS this action to the 19th Judicial District Court, East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on June 27, 2018. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?