Miller v. Singh et al
Filing 38
RULING AND ORDER Adopting 32 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs potential state law claims. Plaintiffs claims against Bickham and Raman Singh are DI SMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants' 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, dismissing all of the plaintiffs claims WITH PREJUDICE, except Plaintiffs retaliation claim and claim for deliberate indifference asserted a gainst Preety Singh. Plaintiff is granted 21 days from the date of this order to amend his complaint with respect to his retaliation claim and claim for deliberate indifference asserted against Preety Singh, in accordance with the Magistrate Judge 's report. Defendants may reurge their motion to dismiss regarding these claims subsequent to any amendments to Plaintiffs complaint. This matter 1s referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 2/27/2019. (KAH)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
