LaVergne v. Stutes et al

Filing 97

OPINION Adopting 95 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims. The plaintiff's claims regarding his conditions of confinement in CCR beginning in October of 2018 are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1997e(a). All other claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 1915A, and that this action is dismissed. All pending Motions be denied as moot. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 9/23/2019. (EDC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
BRANDON S. LAVERGNE (# 424229)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 17-1696-JWD-RLB
KEITH STUTES, ET AL.
Consolidated with:
BRANDON S. LAVERGNE (# 424229)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 18-693-JWD-RLB
KEITH STUTES, ET AL.
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set
forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated September 10, 2019, to which an objection was
filed (Doc. 96);
IT IS ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction
over any potential state law claims.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s claims regarding his conditions of
confinement in CCR beginning in October of 2018 are dismissed without prejudice for failure
to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other claims are dismissed with prejudice for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 1915A, and that this
action is dismissed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending Motions be denied as moot.
Judgment shall be entered accordingly.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 23, 2019.

S

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA