Bouquet v. Orthonet, LLC et al
Filing
11
RULING granting 5 Motion to Dismiss. LSA is dismissed from this casewithout prejudice. Any response to this Ruling based on the appropriate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure shall be filed within 14 days and must be accompanied by an opposition memorandum to the original Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/30/2018. (SGO)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
BREANNE BOUQUET
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
17-1756-SDD-EWD
ORTHONET, LLC, ET AL
RULING
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss1 filed by Defendant,
Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association, Inc. (“LSA”). No opposition to this motion has been filed.
Local rule 7(f) of the Middle District of Louisiana requires that memoranda in
opposition to a motion be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service of the motion.
In the present case, the motion by LSA was electronically filed on December 20,
2017. A review of the record shows that far more than twenty-one (21) days have elapsed
since the electronic service of this Motion, and no memorandum in opposition has been
submitted to date.2 The record also reflects that Plaintiff was aware of this motion on April
19, 2018, when she consented to a continuance of the scheduling conference pending
resolution of this motion.3
Therefore, this Motion is deemed to be unopposed and further, after reviewing the
record, the Court finds that the Motion has merit.
Plaintiff’s Petition for Damages4
contains no allegations concerning LSA other than the allegation that the insurance policy
1
Rec. Doc. 5.
Any opposition to this motion was due on January 10, 2018. The record reflects that no extension of time
was ever requested.
3
Rec. Doc. No. 7.
4
Rec. Doc. 1-3, pp. 2-4.
2
Document Number: 47139
Page 1 of 2
in question was provided to Plaintiff through her spouse’s employment with the West
Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office.5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss6 by the
Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association, Inc. is GRANTED, and LSA is dismissed from this case
without prejudice.
Any response to this Ruling, which should explain the Plaintiff’s failure to comply
with the Court’s deadlines, based on the appropriate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure,
shall be filed within fourteen (14) days and must be accompanied by an opposition
memorandum to the original Motion.
On review of the pleadings filed along with the opposition, the Court, at its
discretion, may assess costs, including attorney’s fees, against the moving party, if the
Court deems that such a motion was unnecessary had a timely opposition memorandum
been filed.7 A statement of costs conforming to L.R. 54(c) shall be submitted by all parties
desiring to be awarded costs and attorney’s fees no later than seven (7) days prior to the
hearing on the newly filed motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 30th day of July, 2018.
S
____________________________________
SHELLY D. DICK, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
5
Rec. Doc. 1-3, p. 2.
Rec. Doc. 5.
7
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 83.
6
Document Number: 47139
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?