Cornelius Wilson v. Hooper et al

Filing 6

RULING AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 5 Motion to Dismiss be treated as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and the clerk of court is directed to close the case. Plaintiff's pending 3 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/30/2019. (KAH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CORNELIUS LORENZO CIVIL ACTION WILSON (#356241) VERSUS NO. 18-301-JWD-EWD TIMOTHY HOOPER, ET AL. RULING AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss. 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” 2 The notice of dismissal is effective immediately. 3 The notice closes the case, the district court is divested of jurisdiction over the case (except for consideration of collateral issues or exercising its supervisory powers), and not even a perfunctory order closing the case is needed. 4 Plaintiff’s Motion is functionally a Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) notice of dismissal, and since it was filed before Defendants served an answer or a motion for summary judgment it should be treated as such. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss 5 be treated as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and the clerk of court is directed to close the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s pending Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 6 be DENIED AS MOOT. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 30, 2019. S 1 JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA R. Doc. 5. Fed. R. Civ. P. art. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 3 Qureshi v. U.S., 600 F.3d 523, 526 (5th Cir. 2010). 4 Id. citing American Cyanamid Co. v. McGhee, 317 F.2d 295, 297 (5th Cir. 1963). 5 R. Doc. 5. 6 R. Doc. 3. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?