Chandler et al v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. et al
Filing
76
RULING Adopting 74 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant, Heberto Balbuena, are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and L ocal Rule 41(b)(1)(A). Plaintiff is hereby granted leave of thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to perfect service on Nathan Johnson or suffer dismissal as recommended in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 74). Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/9/2019. (KAH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
HERMAN CHANDLER, JR.
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
18-353-SDD-RLB
RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., ET AL.
RULING
The Court has carefully considered the Petition,1 the record, the law applicable to
this action, and the Report and Recommendation2 of United States Magistrate Judge
Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated June 13, 2019, to which an objection3 was filed and also
reviewed.
The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge and adopts it as the Court’s opinion herein. However, having considered the
objection, and in the interest of justice, the Court hereby grants Plaintiff thirty (30) days
from the date of this Order to perfect service on Nathan Johnson.
IT IS ORDERED, the Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant, Heberto Balbuena, are
hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and Local Rule 41(b)(1)(A).
1
Rec. Doc. 1.
Rec. Doc. 74.
3
Rec. Doc. 75.
2
IT IS FURTHER OREDERED that the Plaintiff is hereby granted leave of thirty (30)
days from the date of this Order to perfect service on Nathan Johnson or suffer dismissal
as recommended in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc.
74)
Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 9th day of July, 2019.
S
____________________________________
SHELLY D. DICK, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?