Barrow v. Vannoy et al

Filing 111

OPINION Adopting 109 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Defendants Lt. Tillery, Maj. Hooker, Lt. Allen, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to timely effect service upon them. Defendan ts' 89 Motion to Dismiss is granted, dismissing the plaintiff's claims against defendants Reams and Roe, with prejudice. The plaintiff's 88 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's potential state law claims, and this matter be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 7/1/2019. (KAH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
FREDERICK BARROW (#358142)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 18-442-JWD-RLB
DARYL VANNOY, ET AL.
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set
forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated June 20, 2019, to which an objection was filed,
(Doc. 110);
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Lt. Tillery, Maj. Hooker, Lt. Allen, John Doe 1
and John Doe 2 are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to timely effect service upon
them.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 89) is
granted, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims against defendants Reams and Roe, with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. 88) is denied. The Court declines to exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over the
plaintiff’s potential state law claims, and this matter is dismissed.
Judgment shall be entered accordingly.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on July 1, 2019.

S
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA