Cotton v. Tanner et al

Filing 13

RULING and ORDER Adopting 12 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 12/26/2019. (EDC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TALANDIS COTTON (#610891) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS ROBERT TANNER, ETAL. NO.: 18-00539-BAJ-RLB RULING AND ORDER Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(l). The Report and Recommendation addresses pro se Petitioner Talandis Cottons habeas corpus petition (Doc. 1), attacking his 2013 conviction for attempted kidnapping pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Magistrate Judge recommended that Petitioner s habeas corpus relief be denied, and the proceeding dismissed. If the Petitioner seeks to pursue an appeal, the Magistrate Judge also recommended that the certificate of appealability be denied. (Doc. 12 at p. 35). The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(l), they had fourteen days from the date they received the Report and Recommendation to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. No objections or responses were filed by either party. Having carefully considered the underlying Complaint, the instant motion, and related filings, the Court approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief is DENIED. /ldti. Baton -Rouge, Louisiana, this r ~ day of December, 2019. 6^ CL. JUDGE BRIANS^JAtKSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?