Demeke v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and A&M College et al
Filing
50
RULING AND ORDER: granting 30 31 and 41 MOTIONS to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants F. King Alexander, Chelsie Bickel, Stacia Haynie, Kurt Keppler, Matt Lee, Jonathan Sanders, Dawn Sousa-Hearn, Mayank Tyagi, and Judy Wo rnat, Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and A&M College, and Rachel L. Champagne are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, by 11/9/2020, why a final judgment dismissing all claims against "Does 1 to 10, "individuals currently not known to [ ] should not be entered. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 10/29/2020. (SWE)
Case 3:19-cv-00114-BAJ-RLB
Document 50
10/30/20 Page 1 of 15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ESROM DEMEKE CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF NO. 19-00114-BAJ-RLB
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
AND A&M COLLEGE, ET AL.
KULING AND ORDER
Before the Court are the following IVtotions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12: (1) Defendants F. King Alexander, Chelsie Bickel,
Stacia Haynie, Kurt Keppler, IVtatt Lee, Jonathan Sanders, Dawn Sousa-Hearn,
Mayank Tyagi, and Judy Wornat's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 30); (2) Defendant Louisiana State University and
A&M College Board of Supervisors' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
Pursuant to Rule 12(b) (Doc. 31); and (3) Defendant Rachel L. Champagne's
Motion To Dismiss Complaint And First Amended Complaint Pursuant To
Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 41).^
1 According to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Defendants hold the following roles at LSU:
(1) F. King Alexander is President and Chief Executive Officer of LSU (Doc. 26 at ^ 11);
(2) Dr. Stacia Haynie is Executive Vice President and Provost (Id. at ^ 12); (3) Dr. Matt Lee is
Vice Provost for Academic Programs and Support Services {Id. at ^ 13); (4) Dr. Kurt Keppler is
Vice President for Student Affairs (Id, at
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?