Owens v. Saul

Filing 14

OPINION : adopting 9 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 6 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice, to be refiled in the event Plaintiff does not timely effectuate service within the extended time period. Plai ntiff is given an additional 21 days from the date of this Opinion, to effect proper service on the United States Attorney General and to file proof of such service in the record. The previously issued Scheduling Order (Doc. 5) remains in effect. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 6/24/2022. (ELW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXIS OWENS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-389-JWD-SDJ ANDREW SAUL OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated May 11, 2022, (Doc. 9), to which no objection was filed; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 6), filed by Defendant, Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, is DENIED without prejudice, to be refiled in the event Plaintiff does not timely effectuate service within the extended time period. In accordance with the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Johnson (Doc. 9), IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is given an additional 21 days from the date of this Opinion, to effect proper service on the United States Attorney General and to file proof of such service in the record. The previously issued Scheduling Order (Doc. 5) remains in effect. Plaintiff is hereby notified that failure to timely comply with this Opinion may result in the dismissal of her Complaint without further notice. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on June 24, 2022. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?