Johnson v. Agility Fuel Systems, Inc et al

Filing 24

RULING Adopting 21 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge; denying 12 Motion for Leave to File Complaint of Intervention 15 Motion to Remand. Plaintiff's claims in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because BFI is an intervenor of right pursuant to Rule 24(a), and a required party whose Joinder is not feasible under Rule 19(b). Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 10/7/2021. (EDC)

Download PDF
JOHNSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IV11DDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CIVIL ACTION VERSUS 20-733-SDD-RLB AGILITYFUEL SYSTEMS, INC.,ETAL. RULING The Court has carefully considered the Motion^ the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendations2 of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr., dated September 7, 2021, to which an Objection^ and Joint Response4 were filed and also reviewed. The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein. ACCORDINGLY, BFI's Motion for Leave to File Complaint of Intervention (Rec. Doc. 12) and BFI's Motion to Remand Case to State Court (Rec. Doc. 15) are hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because BFI is an intervenor of right pursuant to Rule 24(a), and a required party whose Joinder is not feasible under Rule 19(b). Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana the / day of October, 2021. ^CHIEF JUD^SHELLY D. DICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. 12. 2 Rec. Doc. 21. 3 Rec. Doc. 22. 4 Rec. Doc. 23.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?