Oak Harbor Investment Properties, L.L.C. v. Sedona Corporation

Filing 16

RULING granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. Any response to this Ruling shall be filed within fourteen (14) days and must be accompanied by an oppositionmemorandum to the original Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 4/28/2021. (KMW)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

OAK HARBOR INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES, L.L.C.

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

20-844-SDD-RLB

SEDONA CORPORATION

RULING
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment1 filed by
Plaintiff, Oak Harbor Investment Properties, L.L.C. (“Oak Harbor”). Local rule 7(f) of the
Middle District of Louisiana requires that memoranda in opposition to a motion be filed
within twenty-one (21) days after service of the motion. Despite this rule, Defendant
Sedona Corporation (“Sedona”) has failed to timely oppose this motion, which was
electronically filed on March 12, 2021. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
the Local Rules of Court, Sedona was required to file an opposition no later than April 2,
2021. Therefore, the pending motion is deemed to be unopposed and further, after
reviewing the record, the Court finds that the Motion has merit, particularly because Oak
Harbor’s Statement of Undisputed Facts2 is uncontroverted, and the summary judgment
evidence submitted supports Oak Harbor’s arguments.

1

Rec. Doc. No. 15.
2
Rec. Doc. No. 15-8.

66969 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Oak Harbor’s Motion for Summary
Judgment3 is GRANTED.
Any response to this Ruling, which should explain the Defendant’s failure to comply
with the Court’s deadlines, based on the appropriate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure,
shall be filed within fourteen (14) days and must be accompanied by an opposition
memorandum to the original Motion.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 28th day of April, 2021. 

S

CHIEF JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

3

Rec. Doc. No. 15.

66969