Miller v. Landry et al
Filing
7
OPINION adopting 5 Report and Recommendations, of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.This action shall be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 3/26/2024. (EDC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
PAUL W. MILLER (#05503-095)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 22-563-JWD-SDJ
JEFF LANDRY, ET AL.
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set
forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated February 26, 2024 (Doc. 5), to which an objection
was filed and considered (Doc. 6),
IT IS ORDERED that this action shall be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A1.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental
jurisdiction over any potential state law claims.
Judgment shall be entered accordingly.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 26, 2024.
S
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Plaintiff is advised that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that, “In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal
a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section [Proceedings in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or
more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United
States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.”
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?